{"id":4086,"date":"2025-10-03T14:15:56","date_gmt":"2025-10-03T14:15:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.globaltalenthq.com\/?p=4086"},"modified":"2025-10-06T18:38:27","modified_gmt":"2025-10-06T18:38:27","slug":"how-a-low-key-remark-by-putin-reveals-a-deeper-economic-shift","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.globaltalenthq.com\/index.php\/2025\/10\/03\/how-a-low-key-remark-by-putin-reveals-a-deeper-economic-shift\/","title":{"rendered":"How a low-key remark by Putin reveals a deeper economic shift"},"content":{"rendered":"
The anchor of the global system is shifting from debt claims to real assets, and the implications are profound<\/strong><\/p>\n During his Valdai speech on Thursday, Russian President Vladimir Putin made the following rather dry statement: <\/p>\n “It’s impossible to imagine that a drop in Russian oil production will maintain normal conditions in the global energy sector and the global economy.”<\/em><\/p>\n It certainly wasn’t the highlight of the night, and I haven’t seen it in the headlines of any of the recaps. The statement is, of course, true. Putin is saying: “you can’t kick us out.”<\/em><\/p>\n But let’s unpack this a bit and try to get a bird’s eye view of what this mundane statement implies in a much deeper sense – not in the sense of counting barrels of oil and the Brent price, but in terms of understanding the shifting tectonic plates.<\/p>\n Let’s first imagine what a Western leader might have said in the same tone, circa January 2022.<\/p>\n “It’s impossible to imagine that a country that loses access to dollars and Western capital markets will maintain normal economic conditions.”<\/em> I don’t know if anybody actually said this in as many words, but that’s exactly what many were thinking.<\/p>\n Now, recall the G10 Rome meetings in late 1971, as the Bretton Woods-established gold peg of the dollar was being dismantled, when US Treasury Secretary John Connally famously told his European counterparts: “The dollar is our currency, but it’s your problem.”<\/em> It is an oft-cited instance of American hubris.<\/p>\n In other words, despite its global use in trade and finance, the dollar would be managed for American economic interests.<\/p>\n When the collective West placed what were supposed to be crushing sanctions on Russia in 2022 in light of the Ukraine crisis, the idea was, again, “our currency (system), your problem.”<\/em><\/p>\n The message: the dollar will be managed for American geopolitical interests.<\/p>\n \n Read more<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n According to the conventional thinking, being cut off from the dollar system should have spelt doom for Russia. The many forecasters predicting exactly such a dire outcome weren’t necessarily simply Russophobes. They were working within a certain paradigm. Without access to its now frozen central-bank reserves, how would Russia stabilize the ruble? Without access to correspondent banking in dollars\/euros, how would trade be settled? And without access to foreign capital markets, wouldn’t a funding crisis ensue? This type of thinking gave rise to these types of comments:<\/p>\n “We will provoke the collapse of the Russian economy,”<\/em> in the words of French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire about ten days into the war.<\/p>\n But the Russian economy didn’t collapse and in fact stabilized far faster than anyone expected. The thing is Russian oil and gas was still needed. And those who thought they didn’t need it (read the EU) found out the hard way that they did – even if the Europeans obscured the ramifications as much as possible through large fiscal support and subsidies. But it is no coincidence that ‘deindustrialization’ has become a household word in Europe. And somehow the political will to really clamp down hard on Russian energy never seems to materialize.<\/p>\n All of a sudden we have, from a Russian perspective: “Our commodities, your problem.”<\/em><\/p>\n The question now is: does this mean we’ve suddenly awoken to a strange new world? Are we now in a system where access to real things (like commodities) now trumps access to paper promises (like dollars)? Western policymakers’ futile attempts to cut Russian energy out of the world economy show that they understand only the monetary side of things. They see energy as a source of revenue for the Russian state – revenues thanks to which Russia is able to sustain its war effort. That the economy might actually fundamentally be an energy system and not a monetary system is incomprehensible to them. It is, in the strict Kuhnian sense, a different paradigm.<\/p>\n The BRICS countries talk a lot about a monetary reset being underway and about how new financial architecture is being created. It is fair to say that some of this rhetoric has been premature and that reports of the demise of the dollar system have been overstated. There have been a lot of checks written that BRICS and the Global South aren’t ready to cash.<\/p>\n \n Read more<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Nevertheless, change is afoot, and what is taking shape has roughly the following contours: commodities are beginning, at the margins, to act as system-level collateral. By contrast, up to now, the system relied on trust in the issuer of paper claims (dollars, US Treasuries, euro-denominated assets). Gold accumulation by central banks has been massive – it is a quiet de-dollarization of reserves. Oil-for-yuan deals are modest but growing. And what can the commodity seller do with the yuan it receives? Convert them to gold on the Shanghai Gold Exchange. This may not yet be widespread, but the plumbing is there.<\/p>\n The anchor is shifting from debt claims to real assets – and this is bad news for countries whose economies are perched precariously atop a mountain of debt claims. Think of this as part hedge against Western sanctions and weaponization of the system, and part recognition that commodities have intrinsic durability that paper claims can’t always guarantee. <\/p>\n Ultimately, of course, paper promises can be inflated. It’s not lost on anybody in the Global South that the dollar is down some 111% against gold in just two years and that US debt seems to be spiraling to infinity.<\/p>\n If the current system is one where money, credit, and financial assets are king, this means the constraints in this system are money-related. The crises tend to start with something like a spread blowing out, liquidity drying up, or collateral chains breaking. This is basically a money problem, not a real-economy problem. Remember the 1998 Asia currency meltdown; or the Global Financial Crisis of 2008; or Covid; or the UK gilt crisis of 2022; or the various US repo spikes. Such dislocations are dealt with by throwing balance sheet at them – swap lines, quantitative easing, backstops, emergency loans.<\/p>\n
