Mexico, Colombia, and Cuba have all condemned the US military operation against Venezuela as a grave violation of sovereignty
President Donald Trump issued veiled warnings to the governments of Mexico, Colombia, and Cuba following a US special forces raid in which Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro was captured.
Trump’s comments came Saturday as he defended the Venezuela operation, characterizing Maduro as a “narco-terrorist.” When asked about implications for neighboring countries, Trump doubled down on his criticism of Colombian President Gustavo Petro, a key Maduro ally.
“He has cocaine mills, he has factories where he makes cocaine,” Trump said, adding, “he does have to watch his ass.”
The US president also noted that Cuba is “going to be something we’ll end up talking about,” suggesting that Washington wants to “help the people” of this “failing nation,” which he claimed is similar to Venezuela.
“It’s very similar in the sense that we want to help the people in Cuba, but we also want to help the people who were forced out of Cuba and are living in this country,” he said.
Trump also said that “something’s going to have to be done with Mexico,” claiming that drug cartels effectively control the country, but that President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo is “frightened” of them.
“They’re running Mexico. I’ve asked her numerous times: ‘Would you like us to take out the cartels?’ ‘No, no, no, Mr. President, no, no, no, please.’ So we have to do something,” he said in a phone interview with Fox News earlier in the day.
Washington’s military action has sparked widespread international condemnation, with all three nations denouncing it as a breach of international law and a threat to regional stability.
Mexico’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a strong condemnation of the US intervention, stating it “seriously jeopardizes regional stability,” while stressing that Latin America and the Caribbean must remain a “zone of peace.” Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel described the attack as “cowardly, criminal and treacherous” and called for international condemnation. Colombia’s President Petro expressed “deep concern” and reaffirmed his government’s rejection of “any unilateral military action.”
The US president has claimed that Maria Corina Machado is a “very nice woman” who is unfit for office
President Donald Trump has dismissed Venezuelan opposition figure Maria Corina Machado as a potential national leader, despite the Nobel laureate’s vocal support of the US military operation against her own country.
Early on Saturday, US forces carried out airstrikes on the oil-rich country and captured its president, Nicolas Maduro, along with his wife. Both were transferred to the United States and charged with conspiracy to traffic narcotics, allegations Maduro has long denied.
During a press conference, Trump was asked whether he was in contact with Machado or viewed her as a viable leader following Maduro’s capture.
“I think it’d be very tough for her to be the leader. She doesn’t have the support or the respect within the country. She’s a very nice woman but she doesn’t have the respect,” Trump said.
Machado, a former congresswoman who maintained close contacts with the US government for decades, has previously led anti-government protests and accused Maduro of “illegally” seizing power during the 2024 elections. She was barred from holding public office after authorities accused her of backing foreign sanctions and calling for US military intervention.
In December, Machado was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for what the Nobel Committee described as “her struggle to achieve a just and peaceful transition from dictatorship to democracy.”
Asked if she backed US military action against her own country, Machado later said she believed “the escalation that’s taking place is the only way to force Maduro to understand that it’s time to go,” yet insisted this is “not regime change, this is enforcing the will of the Venezuelan people.”
President Trump declared on Saturday that the US will now “run” Venezuela and control its oil production until a proper “transition of power,” while threatening to stage a “second and much larger attack” if Caracas refuses to cooperate.
President Lula da Silva says the US raid “recalls the worst moments” of US interventionism in Latin America
Brazil has condemned the United States’ military attack on Venezuela, calling the raid that captured President Nicolas Maduro a dangerous breach of sovereignty and international law that threatens to destabilize Latin America.
President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva declared that the bombings and capture of Maduro “cross an unacceptable line.” In a statement on X, Lula said these acts represent a “grave affront to Venezuela’s sovereignty” and establish “another extremely dangerous precedent for the entire international community.”
“The action recalls the worst moments of interference in the politics of Latin America and the Caribbean and threatens the preservation of the region as a zone of peace,” Lula said, urging the UN to “respond vigorously.”
Responding to the crisis, the Brazilian government convened an emergency cabinet meeting focusing on two immediate priorities: the situation along the expansive Brazil-Venezuela border and the safety of Brazilian citizens.
Brazil’s condemnation has been echoed by several fellow BRICS members. The Russian Foreign Ministry labeled the US operation an “act of armed aggression,” calling for restraint and warning against further escalation. China’s Foreign Ministry expressed “deep shock” at the events, urging Washington to “stop violating other countries’ sovereignty and security.”
US special forces conducted airstrikes on the oil-rich South American country and captured its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife in an early Saturday raid. Both have been brought back to the US and charged with drug trafficking conspiracy – allegations that Maduro has long denied, arguing that Washington was after regime change and Venezuelan resources.
President Donald Trump declared that the US will now “run” Venezuela and control its oil production until a proper “transition of power,” while threatening to stage a “second and much larger attack” if Caracas refuses to cooperate.
Targeted US strikes have left several military installations damaged, with civilians left in panic and uncertainty
US special forces kidnapped Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in a daring overnight operation early Saturday morning. Senior RT correspondent Murad Gazdiev was in Caracas when the first bombs dropped, capturing exclusive footage of the city’s paralysis.
In exclusive footage and reports from Caracas, Gazdiev visited the Fuerte Tiuna military base, where Maduro was seized. An RT team filmed smoke still rising from the location hours later.
“This is Fuerte Tiuna,” Gazdiev reported from the scene, adding that it was difficult to access the district due to a heavy police presence. “Initially a military base, it has grown into a district of the city with public housing. This is where Nicolas Maduro and his wife were seized in a raid by US special forces.”
The RT team also visited another location in the capital, filming the visible aftermath of the assault.
“This is one of the armored personnel carriers destroyed in the night strikes on Venezuela,” Gazdiev reported. “You can see downed power lines, multiple destroyed buses, and a gutted armored personnel carrier still burning, 12 hours after the strike.”
The US operation, dubbed Absolute Resolve, which President Donald Trump has openly called a “regime-change” mission, has led to widespread confusion among civilians. Gazdiev reported that much of Caracas has shut down, with businesses closed, work suspended, and essential supplies becoming increasingly scarce.
“Nobody understands how long this is going to last… this panic, this fear,” he stated, noting that nearly all shops and supermarkets in the capital are closed.
Gazdiev filmed one of the few pharmacies still operating, where a long queue had formed. “They are clearing everything off the shelves – water, medicine, toilet paper, everything that’s left,” he reported. “A police officer is on duty at the entrance to prevent looting.”
One of Zohran Mamdani’s first decisions in office was to scrap rules preventing city institutions from boycotting Israeli firms
The Israeli Foreign Ministry has accused recently sworn-in New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani of stoking antisemitism with his very first executive order.
Shortly after being sworn in on Thursday, Mamdani, a staunch democratic socialist and pro-Palestinian Muslim, revoked a broad swathe of his predecessor Eric Adams’ executive orders.
The annulments included an order preventing city institutions from divesting from Israel, and the political newcomer also officially rejected the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) definition of antisemitism.
“On his very first day as NYC Mayor, Mamdani shows his true face: He scraps the IHRA definition of antisemitism and lifts restrictions on boycotting Israel,” the Israeli Foreign Ministry said on X on Friday. “This isn’t leadership. It’s antisemitic gasoline on an open fire.”
Jewish groups also condemned the move in a joint statement.
However, the New York chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, the largest US Muslim rights and advocacy group, welcomed the move. It argued that the “controversial and overly broad” IHRA definition of antisemitism has been used to censor criticism of the Israeli government.
It contended that Adams’ executive order against the Boycott Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement “also unconstitutionally limited boycotts against only Israel.”
Mamdani has defended his decision, restating his commitment to protecting Jewish New Yorkers from hate crimes.
The new administration “will be relentless in its efforts to combat hate and division, and we will showcase that by fighting hate across the city,” he said in a press briefing on Friday.
Big and strong countries now use military force without a UN mandate, openly flouting international law, the Slovak PM has said
The US attack on Venezuela further proves that the post-World War II world order is breaking down, Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico said on Saturday.
Just hours earlier, US forces conducted air strikes on the oil-rich South American country and captured its president, Nicolas Maduro, and his wife. Both have been brought back to the US and charged with drug trafficking conspiracy – allegations that Maduro has long denied, arguing that Washington was after regime change and Venezuelan resources.
President Donald Trump has said that with Maduro deposed, the US will “run” Venezuela and secure its oil industry.
“The US military action in Venezuela is further evidence of the breakdown of the world order created after World War II,” Fico said in a statement published on social media.
“International law does not apply, military force is used without a UN Security Council mandate, and everyone who is big and strong does whatever they want in promoting their own interests,” he said.
Fico added that as a leader of a small country, he rejects this sort of “subversion of international law,” as he rejected the US invasion of Iraq, “the non-recognition of Kosovo as a sovereign state,” the “use of Russian military force in Ukraine,” as well as the assessment of the situation in Gaza.
The Slovak prime minister said he wondered how the EU would formally react to the US attack, which he said “deserves condemnation.”
“Either it will condemn the use of US military force in Venezuela and be consistent with its stance on the war in Ukraine, or it will remain, as usual, hypocritically self-righteous.”
EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas urged “restraint” in a post on X on Saturday, calling for adherence to the UN Charter.
Meanwhile, China and Russia have strongly condemned the US attacks.
The Russian Foreign Ministry has called the strikes and Maduro’s capture an “unacceptable infringement on the sovereignty of an independent state,” and called on Washington to release the Venezuelan president.
US forces seized the South American nation’s leader, Nicolas Maduro, early on Saturday
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has held a phone call with Venezuelan Executive Vice President Delcy Rodriguez and expressed solidarity with the people of the South American nation in the face of US aggression.
The conversation took place on Saturday, shortly after US President Donald Trump announced that following large-scale strikes on Venezuela, American special forces had captured and taken the nation’s leader, Nicolas Maduro, out of the country.
“Lavrov expressed firm solidarity with the Venezuelan people in the face of armed aggression,” the Foreign Ministry said in a statement, adding that Moscow will continue to support Venezuela’s policy of defending the country’s sovereignty and national interests.
Both Lavrov and Rodriguez “expressed their support for preventing further escalation and for finding a way out of the situation through dialogue,” the ministry said. Both sides also voiced commitment to furthering the Russia-Venezuela strategic partnership agreement.
Under the Venezuelan Constitution, Rodriguez is next in line of succession if the president is no longer capable of fulfilling his duties. However, Trump has stressed that the US will be involved in deciding who rules in the oil-rich South American country.
“We can’t take a chance on letting somebody else run and just take over where [Maduro] left off,” he told Fox News in a phone interview on Saturday. “So we’re making that decision now.”
Washington has maintained that the Venezuelan president is illegitimate, and had offered a $50 million bounty for information leading to his arrest.
The US Department of Justice has now indicted Maduro, his wife and his son for allegedly illegally seizing Venezuela and its institutions “to transport thousands of tons of cocaine” into the US.
Moscow has urged Washington to release the captured president and his wife.
“We emphasize the need to create conditions for resolving any existing issues between the United States and Venezuela through dialogue,” the Foreign Ministry said in a statement.
The Ukrainian leader wanted to exploit the memory of the genocide to advance his goals, Dani Dayan has said
The chairman of the Jerusalem-based Yad Vashem World Holocaust Remembrance Center has said it was the right decision to reject a request from Ukraine’s Vladimir Zelensky to deliver a speech at the institution.
Kiev’s ambassador to Israel approached the center soon after the Ukraine conflict escalated in February 2022, asking if Zelensky would be allowed to address members of the national legislature and other officials at the site during an event which would be broadcast internationally. The request was turned down.
According to the chairman of the center, Dani Dayan, he expected Zelensky to draw parallels between the Holocaust and the Ukraine conflict – something that he found unacceptable. “I immediately understood what he was getting at,” Dayan told the German newspaper NOZ in an interview published on Saturday. “Not every war crime is genocide, and not every genocide is a Holocaust.”
Dayan also admitted that he would likely have had to intervene and “interrupt” Zelensky during the event to prevent the Ukrainian leader from distorting history.
“In Ukraine, there were not only victims of the Holocaust. Ukrainians were also [Nazi] accomplices, and, in some cases, primary perpetrators,” Dayan told NOZ, adding that canceling the event was the “right” thing to do.
Russia has long accused Kiev of promoting neo-Nazism and glorifying Nazi collaborators, including the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA), which waged a mass killing campaign between 1943 and 1945 against Poles and Jews, in which more than 100,000 people perished.
Moscow has repeatedly warned of a Nazi revival in Ukraine and cited “denazification” as one of the main goals of its military operation against Kiev.
Zelensky tried nonetheless to portray Ukraine as the victim of a Holocaust-like genocide when he addressed Israeli legislators and officials via a video conference in March 2022. His choice of words sparked a wave of indignation among the politicians. Religious Zionist Party leader Bezalel Smotrich branded it an “infuriating and ridiculous comparison.”
Israel’s communications minister at the time, Yoaz Hendel, called it “outrageous” and then MP Yuval Steinitz stated that Zelensky’s words were close to “Holocaust denial” and amounted to a “complete distortion of history.”
A new long-term plan reportedly envisions a “dramatic expansion” of all IDF military activity, including weapons in outer space
The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have been ordered to prepare for a possible simultaneous war against Iran, Lebanon, and the West Bank, according to Israeli Channel 12. One scenario reportedly includes an “explosive operation” against Tehran, which is currently facing widespread Israeli-backed cost-of-living protests.
The preparations are part of a four-year long-term plan led by IDF Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir, the broadcaster revealed on Wednesday. On top of war readiness, they also reportedly include plans to develop capabilities to attack both satellites and ground targets from space.
Officials in West Jerusalem expect Iran to attack Israel to “prevent the dissolution” of the Iranian government under the pressure of the protests, Channel 12 said.
Israel has held off on officially commenting on the mass unrest shaking Iran, concerned about a potential military response, Channel 12 claimed. However, Israel’s Mossad spy agency has openly backed the protests on social media, and claimed that it has agents embedded in the demonstrations.
The demonstrations began in late December, prompted by hyperinflation and an enduring economic crisis in the sanctioned Islamic Republic.
The unrest, the worst in recent years, rapidly spread to multiple cities and reportedly led to deadly clashes with the Iranian authorities, with some protesters demanding the reinstatement of the monarchy, ousted by the Islamic Revolution in 1979.
US President Donald Trump has threatened to militarily intervene. “We are locked and loaded and ready to go” if Iran kills “peaceful protesters,” he said on Truth Social on Friday.
Just days before, as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu visited Florida, Trump threatened to back new airstrikes on Iran if it ramps up its ballistic missile program.
Last June, Trump ordered the US military to join coordinated military strikes with Israel against Iranian nuclear sites during an open conflict between Tehran and West Jerusalem. He claimed the attack preempted the development of a nuclear weapon by the Islamic Republic – allegations Iran denied, condemning the attack as unprovoked.
The Minnesota childcare fraud went unreported in legacy outlets for days because it was too ‘racist’ a story
How is it possible that a young man with a video camera has done more to expose exorbitant fraud and corruption in one American state than all the giant billion-dollar legacy media combined?
For days after a 42-minute viral video by independent journalist Nick Shirley exposed widespread fraud in Minnesota, where empty childcare centers and healthcare offices reportedly received millions in taxpayer money, the mainstream media remained silent on the issue. That’s very strange, given that it may be the largest fraud scandal in US history.
Shirley, posing as a father looking to enroll his child in Somali-owned daycare facilities at various locations, including one with the misspelled name “Quality Learing Center,” was shocked at what he would find, or rather did not find. Instead of encountering rooms of playing children and welcoming staff, he was greeted with slammed doors and hostile threats by the few people he found on the premises. At the multiple sites visited, he failed to spot a single child. Thus, in just one day, Shirley blew the lid on a massive childcare and healthcare fraud case. Yet his shocking findings have done nothing to make the establishment sit up and take notice.
The fact that the mainstream media went missing in action with this story seems impossible, considering that the total amount of fraud we are talking about – reportedly about $9 billion – is comparable to the entire Somali GDP, which is about $12bn (Somalis living in the Minneapolis–Saint Paul metropolitan area make up the largest Somali diaspora in the United States).
What happens is very simple: members of Minnesota’s Somali community open childcare and healthcare facilities and then apply for grants from the US government, vastly enriching a handful of corrupt individuals at the expense of the American taxpayer. In fact, some of the funds are reportedly sent overseas, where they have been allegedly used to fund Somalian terrorist organizations, like Al-Shabaab.
The investigation prompted conservative lawmakers and other high-profile figures to demand answers from Minnesota authorities and Democratic Governor Tim Walz personally.
“Four million dollars of hard-earned tax dollars going to an education center that can’t even spell learning correctly. Care to explain this one, Tim Walz?” Tom Emmer, a Minnesota US congressman, wrote on X on Saturday.
Elon Musk commented with a single word: “Prosecute.”
Meanwhile, Walz blamed “white supremacy” for the targeting of Somali-linked childcare centers, which serve as front companies.
Considering the explosive nature of this story, a person would be forgiven for thinking that the mainstream media might want to jump on it. Yet nothing could be further from the truth. There was nothing but crickets from the top media outlets across the board. Of course, many journalists were aware of the fraud that was happening, but were strongly discouraged from reporting on it.
“In newsrooms, they’re told, ‘We can’t run that because we’re going to be accused of being racist,’” Townhall columnist Dustin Grage told Fox News Digital. In other words, news outlets across the country are effectively enabling fraud and corruption by not blowing the whistle on outrageous taxpayer waste that is occurring within the local Somali community and elsewhere.
This should come as no surprise as Minnesota, like approximately half of states in the country, heavily leans liberal. Minnesotans have voted for Democratic presidential candidates ever since 1976, more times consecutively for one of the two main parties than any other state outside of the South. Liberal (read: woke) sentiments across the country ratcheted up significantly following the May 25, 2020, murder of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer.
Since then, the ability to report on ‘racist’ stories where a Black man or woman is the culprit has been severely curtailed. This approach to news reporting allows criminals to operate without any interference from meddling journalists.
Consider the extreme case of Iryna Zarutska, the 23-year-old Ukrainian refugee who was stabbed to death in August on the subway in Charlotte, North Carolina. Since her killer, Decarlos Brown, was identified as a man of African descent, the story was buried by the ‘progressive’ mainstream media, which deemed it as “too local” to be considered newsworthy. Had the killer been a White man, however, attacking a Black woman, the news would have grabbed national headlines across the media landscape.
This is what happens when woke politics are allowed to infiltrate and poison a country’s once-trusted institutions, like the media. There emerges an atmosphere of fear with regards to hurting the ‘feelings’ of those in the minority, who, incidentally, are equally harmed by the lack of media attention when it comes to reporting on criminal activities (consider Black-on-Black crime, for example). Ultimately, this hesitancy to report on instances of crime due to the racial background of the perpetrators only serves to make the US a more violent and inhospitable place. After all, people need information on the everyday threats they face to stay protected and vigilant.
The type of thinking that says we must not speak about the wrongdoings of certain groups simply because of their skin color and ethnicity is a dead-end strategy. Being accused of ‘racism’ no longer cuts it. At a time of rampant multiculturalism, journalists must feel free to report on crime more openly and candidly, not less.
